Assessing Students' Speaking Ability Using Communicative Language Testing Approach on Secondary Level in the Pandemic Era
Abstract
The objectives of this study are: (1) to find out what types of speaking skills in the communicative language testing approach do the teachers use on the secondary level; (2) and to find out which of the five types of speaking skills on the communication language test were most used by teachers during the pandemic. This study used the descriptive qualitative method. Respondents of this study were English teachers at the secondary level in Jakarta, which consisted of 20 teachers. The results of this study indicate that: first, the English teacher only uses performance to assess students' speaking ability in this pandemic era. Second, Assessing Students' Speaking Ability Using Communicative Language Testing Approach on a Secondary Level in the Pandemic Era is only carried out during the initial assessment stage and formative test. The implementation of the assessment of students' speaking abilities using a Communicative Language Testing Approach was applied when the teacher asked students to build a response or performance that is not just providing information. The teacher asks students to solve specific case problems (problem-solving). The teacher asks students to select the correct response that requires information and concepts so that they are more active in class because they must be able to bring information to solve problems based on the learning material that has been previously delivered. Third, teachers' perceptions are assessment using Communicative Language Testing is very good for improving students' speaking ability because students clearly show their work. Students can convey their ideas without fear. Students not only understand the theory but practice it in real life. On the other hand, the use of authentic assessment takes a long time.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abduh, M. Y. M. (2021). Full-time online assessment during COVID-19 lockdown: EFL teachers’ perceptions. Asian EFL Journal, 28(11), 26–46.
Albiansyah, A., & Prasetyo, A. Minkhatunnakhriyah, M. (2020). The Communicativeness of English Tests at Vocational High School. Trans-Kata, 1(1), 7.
Amiri, M., & Ghonsooly, B. (2015). The relationship between English learning anxiety and the students’ achievement on examinations. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 855–865.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (Eight). Wadsworth.
Brown, D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment principles and classroom practices (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson Education.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Brunfaut, T., Kormos, J., Michel, M., & Ratajczak, M. (2021). Testing young foreign language learners’ reading comprehension: Exploring the effects of working memory, grade level, and reading task. Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532221991480
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks.
Darling-Hammond, L. Herman, J., & Pellegrino, J. (2013). Criteria for high-quality assessment. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Dean, J. B. (2005). Testing in Language Programs. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Fulcher, G. (2014). Testing Second Language Speaking. Routledge.
Harsono, Y. M. (2005). Developing Communicative Language Tests for Senior High School. TEFLIN Journal, 16(2), 237–255.
Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English Language Test. Longman.
Hilton, K. (2016). The perception of overlapping speech: Effects of speaker prosody and listener attitudes. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH, 08-12-Sept(December), 1260–1264. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2016-1456
Lyddon, P. A. (2016). Mobile-assisted language learning and language learner autonomy. CALL Communities and Culture–Short Papers from EUROCALL, 302–306.
Morrow, K. (1981). Communicative Language Testing: Evolution or Revolution? In J. C. Alderson & A. Hughes (Ed.), Issues in Language Testing (p. 217). British Council.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. In McGraw-Hill Companies, (First). McGraw-Hill.
Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. In Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740553
Patricia, B., Paul, W., & Winter, J. (2002). Assessment What’s In It For Schools? Routledge.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The. uses of the first language. SAGE Journals, 4(3), 251–274.
Tan, K. H., Farashaiyan, A., Sahragard, R., & Faryabi, F. (2020). Implications of English as an international language for language pedagogy. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p22
Wardhono, A., & Spanos, S. (2018). Assessing English Speaking and Listening Skills with the Mobile Application Telegram. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(2), 147–174.
Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2766
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 87 timesPDF - 55 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Ratu Erlinda Kurniatillah, Zwyna Rafika, Nida Husna, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, Fitriah Fitriah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



1.png)